Increased endorsement of TRIPOD and other reporting guidelines by high impact factor journals: survey of instructions to authors

J Clin Epidemiol. 2024 Jan:165:111188. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.10.004. Epub 2023 Oct 16.

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the endorsement of reporting guidelines by high impact factor journals over the period 2017-2022, with a specific focus on the Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD) statement.

Study design and setting: We searched the online 'instructions to authors' of high impact factor medical journals in February 2017 and in January 2022 for any reference to reporting guidelines and TRIPOD in particular.

Results: In 2017, 205 out of 337 (61%) journals mentioned any reporting guideline in their instructions to authors and in 2022 this increased to 245 (73%) journals. A reference to TRIPOD was provided by 27 (8%) journals in 2017 and 67 (20%) in 2022. Of those journals mentioning TRIPOD in 2022, 22% provided a link to the TRIPOD website and 60% linked to TRIPOD information on the Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research (EQUATOR) Network website. Twenty-five percent of the journals required adherence to TRIPOD.

Conclusion: About three-quarters of high-impact medical journals endorse the use of reporting guidelines and 20% endorse TRIPOD. Transparent reporting is important in enhancing the usefulness of health research and endorsement by journals plays a critical role in this.

Keywords: Adherence; Endorsement; Implementation; Prediction model; Reporting guideline; TRIPOD.

MeSH terms

  • Humans
  • Periodicals as Topic*
  • Prognosis
  • Surveys and Questionnaires